What is the main reason that Rome was built on hills?
A.
The hills had fertile farmland.
B.
The hills provided a natural defense.
C.
The hills were near a port.
D.
The hills were densely populated.
it got to be between A OR B
Yes, it's one of those. Which one makes the most sense to you?
No. Farms need relatively flat land. Hills are not good agricultural sites.
Oh so its B thank you soo much
Yes, B. You're welcome.
thxz :)
The main reason that Rome was built on hills is option B - the hills provided a natural defense. To understand why, let's break it down.
Rome was initially settled in the 8th century BC, and the hills provided a strategic advantage for defense against potential invaders. The several hills, including the Palatine, Aventine, and Capitoline hills, offered a natural barrier that made it difficult for enemies to attack the city easily.
The steep slopes and rocky terrain of the hills acted as a natural defense wall, making it harder for enemy forces to approach and invade the city from all sides. This advantageous position allowed Rome to defend itself more effectively and withstand various attacks throughout its history.
So, the main reason for building Rome on hills was to take advantage of the natural defensive position they provided.