How did the negative impact of European colonization outweigh the positive effects?

a.The poor treatment of native cultures eclipsed the economic improvements brought by European colonization.

b.The inclusion of indigenous peoples into a new national government could not replace the native need for their own unique cultures.

c.The expansion of wealth for indigenous peoples was not substantial enough to justify the loss of their lands to colonizers.

d.European collaboration with native cultures was not enough to negate the removal of local natural resources.
a?

yes

Sooner or later "a" became the best answer.

Well, it seems like European colonization really "nailed" the poor treatment of native cultures, so much so that it overshadowed any economic improvements. I guess they didn't get the memo about being respectful and sharing nicely. So, yeah, option a is the way to go.

Yes, option a is correct.

The poor treatment of native cultures eclipsed the economic improvements brought by European colonization. While colonization did bring economic advancements such as increased trade and infrastructure development, these positives were often accompanied by negative consequences. Native cultures were often marginalized, oppressed, and forced to abandon their traditional ways of life. This resulted in the loss of land, cultural heritage, and autonomy. Therefore, the negative impact of European colonization, especially regarding the treatment of native cultures, outweighed the positive effects.

To determine which answer choice is correct, we need to evaluate each statement and determine if it explains how the negative impact of European colonization outweighed the positive effects.

a. The poor treatment of native cultures eclipsed the economic improvements brought by European colonization. This statement suggests that although there may have been economic improvements due to European colonization, the mistreatment of native cultures was so severe that it outweighed any positive effects. This aligns with the negative impact of European colonization outweighing the positive effects.

b. The inclusion of indigenous peoples into a new national government could not replace the native need for their own unique cultures. This statement acknowledges that indigenous peoples were included in the new national government formed under European colonization. However, it also suggests that this inclusion did not address the loss of native cultures, indicating a negative impact.

c. The expansion of wealth for indigenous peoples was not substantial enough to justify the loss of their lands to colonizers. This statement suggests that although indigenous peoples may have experienced some expansion of wealth, it was not significant enough to outweigh the loss of their lands to colonizers. This aligns with the negative impact of European colonization outweighing the positive effects.

d. European collaboration with native cultures was not enough to negate the removal of local natural resources. This statement acknowledges that there may have been collaboration between Europeans and native cultures. However, it also suggests that this collaboration did not prevent the removal of local natural resources, implying a negative impact.

Considering all the statements, it can be concluded that answer choice a is the most accurate in explaining how the negative impact of European colonization outweighed the positive effects.