Which are examples of judicial restraint in the Supreme Court? Select all that apply.
A:The verdict overturns the lower court's ruling and sets a new precedent.
B:The verdict is narrowly for the defendant, letting the previous verdict stand.***
C:The court uses previous cases as examples of what path to follow in their verdict.***
D:The court decides that the law must be rewritten to provide civil liberties for all.***
E:The court refuses to hear a case.
Are these correct?
The correct options for examples of judicial restraint in the Supreme Court are:
B: The verdict is narrowly for the defendant, letting the previous verdict stand.
C: The court uses previous cases as examples of what path to follow in their verdict.
E: The court refuses to hear a case.
Options A and D are not examples of judicial restraint. Option A suggests that the court overturns the lower court's ruling and sets a new precedent, which is an example of judicial activism. Option D suggests that the court decides to rewrite the law to provide civil liberties for all, which is also an example of judicial activism.
Based on the principles of judicial restraint, which involves a limited exercise of judicial power and a tendency to defer to the other branches of government, the examples of judicial restraint in the Supreme Court are:
B: The verdict is narrowly for the defendant, letting the previous verdict stand. This reflects a reluctance to make significant changes or overturn previous rulings.
C: The court uses previous cases as examples of what path to follow in their verdict. This shows deference to established legal precedents and a conservative approach to decision-making.
E: The court refuses to hear a case. This demonstrates a restraint in exercising their jurisdiction and allows other branches of government or lower courts to resolve the issue.
Therefore, options B, C, and E are correct examples of judicial restraint in the Supreme Court.