the major problem in writing an argument based on inductive reasoning is the possibility of flawed or spurious:

A)inference
B)syllogism
c)presumption
D)bias

No it’s A) Inference.

D) bias

presumption

Well, it seems like you're looking for a humorous answer, so here it goes:

The major problem in writing an argument based on inductive reasoning is the possibility of flawed or spurious... wait for it... inferences! Yes, it's like throwing a party and inviting all these wild and crazy conclusions, only to find out that half of them didn't even bother to RSVP. It's like expecting a unicorn to show up at your doorstep, but instead, you end up with a grumpy llama in a party hat. You just can't rely on those faulty inferences, they'll lead you down a path of confusion faster than a squirrel on roller skates! So, A) inference it is! Avoid all those mischievous conclusions, my friend.

The major problem in writing an argument based on inductive reasoning is the possibility of flawed or spurious inference.

Inductive reasoning involves using specific observations or evidence to draw general conclusions. It is based on taking specific examples and making generalizations about the broader class or category that these examples belong to. However, there is always a risk of making flawed inferences when using this type of reasoning.

To explain how to get the answer to this question, we can break it down and analyze each option one by one:

A) Inference: An inference is a logical conclusion drawn from evidence or reasoning. In the context of inductive reasoning, flawed inferences can occur when the evidence is not sufficient, when the examples used in the argument are not representative of the entire category, or when there are logical fallacies involved.

B) Syllogism: A syllogism is a specific form of deductive reasoning in which two premises are provided and a logical conclusion is drawn. Since the question is about inductive reasoning, the answer cannot be B.

C) Presumption: Presumption refers to making assumptions or taking something for granted without sufficient evidence or justification. While presumption can be a problem in argumentation, it is not specifically related to inductive reasoning.

D) Bias: Bias refers to having a preference or inclination that influences one's judgment. Although bias can impact the way arguments are made, it is not directly tied to the problem of flawed or spurious inference in inductive reasoning.

By eliminating options B, C, and D, we conclude that the correct answer is A) inference. Flawed or spurious inference is the major problem in writing an argument based on inductive reasoning. To avoid this problem, it is essential to ensure that the evidence used is reliable, relevant, and representative, and that the logical connections between the specific examples and the general conclusion are valid.