WHAT CAUSE AN ELECTRON TO OCCUPY A HIGHER ORBIT??
Do you really mean an electron or are you really referring to a planet or satellite since the title of your post is astronomy?
If you really meant a planet or satellite:
Consider a satellite in a circular orbit around the earth. In order to raise the satellite to a specific higher altitude orbit, a specific propulsive force must ba applied to the satellite to kick it out of orbit into an elliptical orbit with an appogee of the desired new altitude. Once the satellite has reached the new appogee altitude, another specific propulsive force must be applied to increase the velocity of the satellite to the circular velocity for that altitude.
Lets consider the scenario where the space shuttle has to rendevouz with the old MIR space station, each being in a different orbit. The Space Shuttle Orbiter typically launches into a 50 x 100 miles temporary orbit, burning out at 50 miles and ascending to 100 miles. Upon reaching the 100 mile apogee, the Orbiter fires its Orbital Maneuvering System motors to inject the Orbiter into another elliptical transfer orbit with an apogee of the desired final mission altitude. Upon reaching this new apogee, the OMS fires again to increase the velocity to circular velocity for that altitude. Rather than stepping through this somewhat involved sequence of events, I will offer you a simplified scenario that will suffice to get the point across regarding what we are trying to learn about here.
Lets assume that our target vehicle is still the MIR Space Station in a 232 miles high circular orbit. Lets assume, however, that the Space Shuttle Orbiter launched into a ~110 mile high circular orbit to deposit another satellite and, from here, will rendezvous with the MIR. The circular velocity of this orbit is ~25,587 fps (~17,442 MPH) and the period 88 minutes. The Orbiter must now change its orbit and ascend to the MIR orbit in order to execute the rendezvous. How best can this be achieved?
You might have already guessed how we are going to accomplish our rendezvous. You saw above that increasing our velocity places us on a new elliptical orbit with an apogee somewhat higher than our firing point. Isn't this what we are trying to accomplish, i.e., raise our alitude from a 110 mile circular orbit to a 232 mile circular orbit? We could execute several orbital exchanges in the hope of reaching our destination as quickly as possible and with a minimum of propellant expenditures. Might there be an optimum approach to the problem?
The successful execution of this type of orbital exchange maneuver was first recognized and described by the famous German engineer Dr. Walter Hohmann. In 1925, many years before space travel was a reality, he derived what was considered to be the most energy efficient method for transferring a vehicle between two coplanar circular orbits. Not surprisingly, the method involved the utilization of an elliptical orbit between the two circular orbits involved. The velocity of the vehicle in the lower obrit is increased by an amount that will place the vehicle on an elliptical path to a higher altitude. The firing point, the altitude of the lower orbit, becomes the perigee of the transfer orbit, with the apogee the altitude of the higher orbit, 180 degrees away from perigee. The elliptical transfer orbit is, by definition, cotangent to both of the circular orbits. Upon reaching the apogee of the transfer orbit, cotangent to the higher circular orbit, the velocity has dropped below the required circular velocity for the higher orbit. Thus, the velocity of the vehicle is again increased to bring it up to the required circular velocity, and we are safely in the higher orbit. Relatively simple and elegant, yes? This method, historically referred to as the Two Burn Hohmann Transfer Orbit, HTO, is used for just about every transfer of vehicles between differing altitude orbits.
So how do we go about raising the orbit of our Orbiter? All we have to do is fire our OMS engines, increase our velocity to 25,755 fps (17,570 MPH) and ascend to our 232 mile target altitude in the half period of 45 minutes. Boy, that was easy. But hold on a minute. Yes, we have ascended to 232 miles but our velocity has dropped to 25,026 fps (17,059 MPH) and we are about to descend on our way back down to our original 110 mile altitude. What must we do? Of course, as Dr. Hohmann proposed, we must increase our 25,026 fps. velocity to the 25,212 fps. circular velocity of the target orbit and we are home free. You might be surprised by the small velocity increments involved (typically referred to as deltaV's for delta velocities). An increase of only 188 fps to raise our altitude and an additional 186 fps. to circularize our orbit.
Well, we have now discovered how to raise the orbit of our Orbiter, but we have yet to address the primary objective of our mission, rendezvousing with the MIR. Clearly, what we really want to do is raise our orbit, but simultaneously, meet up with the MIR, or at worst, reach a point a few minutes ahead of, or behind, MIR as discussed ealier. So what are we faced with? A very unique game of space tag. MIR is in a 232 mile orbit with a 92 minute period. We are in a 110 mile orbit with an 88 minute period. We have two options depending on our actual angular relationship to one another.
Lets examine the most desireable approach first. Ideally, we want to place our Orbiter on a HTO that will ascend to, and reach, a point in the MIR orbit at exactly the moment that MIR reaches the same point. Knowing that our HTO ascent will take 45 minutes, we therefore, must fire our engines at a time when MIR is 45 minutes away from our designated meeting point in their orbit. Since MIR's orbital half period is 46 minutes, we must fire our engines when MIR is one minute ahead of us in their orbit or ~4 degrees ahead of us. At the point of firing, both MIR and our Orbiter have 45 minutes to travel before meeting. Upon reaching the meeting point, the Orbiter fires its engines again to circularize the orbit and the final rendezvous maneuvers can commense.
The other option available to us is to ascend on a HTO that will place the Orbiter a few minutes ahead of, or behind, the MIR, from which point they can execute the catch up maneuvers described earlier. It is obvious that the key orbital maneuver that must be executed in the first place is the placement of the Orbiter in the proper angular relationship to MIR in the initial lower circular orbit, which, in the final analysis, is what determines launch time. The Shuttle must lift off, reach the 50 x 100 mile parking orbit, and ultimately ascend to the first, low altitude, 110 mile circular orbit for depositing the satellite payload, and be in the proper relationship to MIR for the ultimate HTO and rendezvous.
Lets now consider the scenario where the two vehicles are in totally different orbits. The Space Shuttle Orbiter typically launches into a 50 x 100 miles temporary orbit, burning out at 50 miles and ascending to 100 miles. Upon reaching the 100 mile apogee, the Orbiter fires its Orbital Maneuvering System motors to inject the Orbiter into another elliptical transfer orbit with an apogee of the desired final mission altitude. Upon reaching this new apogee, the OMS fires again to increase the velocity to circular velocity for that altitude. Rather than stepping through this somewhat involved sequence of events, I will offer you a simplified scenario that will suffice to get the point across regarding what we are trying to learn about here.
Lets assume that our target vehicle is still the MIR Space Station in a 232 miles high circular orbit. Lets assume, however, that the Space Shuttle Orbiter launched into a ~110 mile high circular orbit to deposit another satellite and, from here, will rendezvous with the MIR. The circular velocity of this orbit is ~25,587 fps (~17,442 MPH) and the period 88 minutes. The Orbiter must now change its orbit and ascend to the MIR orbit in order to execute the rendezvous. How best can this be achieved?
You might have already guessed how we are going to accomplish our rendezvous. You saw above that increasing our velocity places us on a new elliptical orbit with an apogee somewhat higher than our firing point. Isn't this what we are trying to accomplish, i.e., raise our alitude from a 110 mile circular orbit to a 232 mile circular orbit? We could execute several orbital exchanges in the hope of reaching our destination as quickly as possible and with a minimum of propellant expenditures. Might there be an optimum approach to the problem?
The successful execution of this type of orbital exchange maneuver was first recognized and described by the famous German engineer Dr. Walter Hohmann. In 1925, many years before space travel was a reality, he derived what was considered to be the most energy efficient method for transferring a vehicle between two coplanar circular orbits. Not surprisingly, the method involved the utilization of an elliptical orbit between the two circular orbits involved. The velocity of the vehicle in the lower obrit is increased by an amount that will place the vehicle on an elliptical path to a higher altitude. The firing point, the altitude of the lower orbit, becomes the perigee of the transfer orbit, with the apogee the altitude of the higher orbit, 180 degrees away from perigee. The elliptical transfer orbit is, by definition, cotangent to both of the circular orbits. Upon reaching the apogee of the transfer orbit, cotangent to the higher circular orbit, the velocity has dropped below the required circular velocity for the higher orbit. Thus, the velocity of the vehicle is again increased to bring it up to the required circular velocity, and we are safely in the higher orbit. Relatively simple and elegant, yes? This method, historically referred to as the Two Burn Hohmann Transfer Orbit, HTO, is used for just about every transfer of vehicles between differing altitude orbits.
So how do we go about raising the orbit of our Orbiter? All we have to do is fire our OMS engines, increase our velocity to 25,755 fps (17,570 MPH) and ascend to our 232 mile target altitude in the half period of 45 minutes. Boy, that was easy. But hold on a minute. Yes, we have ascended to 232 miles but our velocity has dropped to 25,026 fps (17,059 MPH) and we are about to descend on our way back down to our original 110 mile altitude. What must we do? Of course, as Dr. Hohmann proposed, we must increase our 25,026 fps. velocity to the 25,212 fps. circular velocity of the target orbit and we are home free. You might be surprised by the small velocity increments involved (typically referred to as deltaV's for delta velocities). An increase of only 188 fps to raise our altitude and an additional 186 fps. to circularize our orbit.
Well, we have now discovered how to raise the orbit of our Orbiter, but we have yet to address the primary objective of our mission, rendezvousing with the MIR. Clearly, what we really want to do is raise our orbit, but simultaneously, meet up with the MIR, or at worst, reach a point a few minutes ahead of, or behind, MIR as discussed ealier. So what are we faced with? A very unique game of space tag. MIR is in a 232 mile orbit with a 92 minute period. We are in a 110 mile orbit with an 88 minute period. We have two options depending on our actual angular relationship to one another.
Lets examine the most desireable approach first. Ideally, we want to place our Orbiter on a HTO that will ascend to, and reach, a point in the MIR orbit at exactly the moment that MIR reaches the same point. Knowing that our HTO ascent will take 45 minutes, we therefore, must fire our engines at a time when MIR is 45 minutes away from our designated meeting point in their orbit. Since MIR's orbital half period is 46 minutes, we must fire our engines when MIR is one minute ahead of us in their orbit or ~4 degrees ahead of us. At the point of firing, both MIR and our Orbiter have 45 minutes to travel before meeting. Upon reaching the meeting point, the Orbiter fires its engines again to circularize the orbit and the final rendezvous maneuvers can commense.
The other option available to us is to ascend on a HTO that will place the Orbiter a few minutes ahead of, or behind, the MIR, from which point they can execute the catch up maneuvers described earlier. It is obvious that the key orbital maneuver that must be executed in the first place is the placement of the Orbiter in the proper angular relationship to MIR in the initial lower circular orbit, which, in the final analysis, is what determines launch time. The Shuttle must lift off, reach the 50 x 100 mile parking orbit, and ultimately ascend to the first, low altitude, 110 mile circular orbit for depositing the satellite payload, and be in the proper relationship to MIR for the ultimate HTO and rendezvous.
http://library.thinkquest.org/15567/lessons/2.html
If you mean an electron in position around a positive nucleus, then the "orbital" it occupies is dependent on the energy state it has. It can change to a higher energy state if energy is absorbed from a photon.
Despite the word orbitals used to describe the position of electrons about the nucleus, electrons do not orbit the nucleus in the manner of small planets about tiny sun. Instead, the quantum model of the atom helps us understand that the electrons are placed in probability fields of designated shapes away from the nucleus.
 👍
 👎
 👁
 ℹ️
 🚩
Answer this Question
Related Questions

Physics (Electric Potential)
Good afternoon! I'm stumped with this question here. Q: An electron starts from rest 32.5 cm from a fixed point charge with Q=0.125μC. How fast will the electron be moving when it is very far away? I got an answer of 5.54 * 10^16 J, but apparently it is
 asked by Anonymous

Chemistry
The energies, E, for the first few states of an unknown element are shown here in arbitrary units: n= 1, E=21 n=2, E=9 n=3, E=4 n=4, E=3 ...,... infinity, 0 A gaseous sample of this element is bombarded by photons of various energies (in these same
 asked by tec

Chemistry
The energy levels of oneelectron ions are given by the equation: En=(2.18*10^(18)J)(Z^2/n^2) The series in the He spectrum that corresponds to the set of transitions where the electron falls from a higher level to the nf = 4 state is called the
 asked by Anonymous

chemistry
An electron in a hydrogen atom relaxes to the n= 4 level, emitting light of 138 THz. What is the value of n for the level in which the electron originated?
 asked by lorah hilpolep

Chemistry
What electron transition in a hydrogen atom, ending in the orbit 4, will produce light of wavelength 2170 nm ?
 asked by Chironjit

Chemistry
An electron is excited from the n=1 ground state to the n=3 state in a hydrogen atom. Which of the following statements are true? Correct the false statements to make them true. A. It takes more energy to ionize (completely remove) the electron from n=3
 asked by Anonymous

Chem
How is the light emitted by an atom related to its electron configuration? A Light is produced when an electron moves from a higher to a lower energy level. The color of the light (as we see it) depends on the amount of energy emitted by the electron. B
 asked by Anonymous

chemistry
Why is there a decrease in electron affinity going from lithium to sodium? A. There is a stronger nuclear charge, with no additional shielding electrons or number of shells. B. There are fewer spaces in the valence shell in which to place the added
 asked by Morgan

chemistry
The energy levels the electron can occupy in the Be3+ ion can be calculated using the energy level equation. A Be3+ ion with an electron in the n= 3.00 level emitted a photon with a frequency of 7.30 × 1015 Hz. What is the value of the level n for the new
 asked by mike

physics
An electron is accelerated from rest to a velocity of 2.0x10^7 m/s. a) if the electron travelled 0.10m while it was being accelerated, what was its acceleration? b)How long did the electron take to attain its final velocity? Please correct me if I'm wrong
 asked by Leo

Chemistry
Element x has the highest first electron affinity in its period, the ground state electron configuration of its common is: [Kr] 5s2 4d10 5p6 Element Y is the second largest element in its period; its valence electron are in orbital(s) that have n= 6. What
 asked by Kara

Chemistry
In the voltaic cell that is represented as: Cu  Cu2+  Fe  Fe2+. The only anion in solution in the cells and salt bridge is the nitrate ion. The directions the electron external circuit and NO3 flow in the salt bridge circuit will be: *electron flow is
 asked by Mikah

The Binding Energy of Electrons?
An Xray photon of wavelength 0.954 nm strikes a surface. The emitted electron has a kinetic energy of 935 eV. What is the binding energy of the electron in kJ/mol? [KE =1/2 mv^2; 1 electron volt (eV) = 1.602 x 10^ 19 J]
 asked by Amy

chemistry
An electron in a hydrogen atom relaxes to the n= 4 level, emitting light of 138 THz . What is the value of for the level in which the electron originated? Please show each step and the equation.
 asked by lorah hilpolep

Chemistry
Hi everyone, I'm having problems with effective nuclear charge. Regarding these problems. Calculate Zeff for a valence electron in an oxygen atom. and Calculate Zeff for the 4s electron in a copper atom, . and Calculate Zeff for a 3d electron in a copper
 asked by Robert

Chemistry
An electron moves with a velocity of 2.5 x 10^8 cm/s. What is its wavelength? (The mass of an electron is 9.109 x 10^28 g.)
 asked by Anonymous

AP Chemistry
Which of the following electron configurations correspond to an excited state? Identify the atoms and write the groundstate electron configuration where appropriate. If the configuration is a noble gas, enter the noble gas in brackets, for example [Ne]
 asked by Ferdinand

chemistry
I am confused on how to even start this problem... A ground state H atom absorbs a photon of wavelength 94.91 nm, and its electron attains a higher energy level. The atom then emits two photons: one of wavelength 1281 nm to reach an intermediate level, and
 asked by Candace

College Chem.
Determine the longest wavelength of light required to remove an electron from a sample of potassium metal, if the binding energy for an electron in K is 1.76 × 103 kJ/mol.
 asked by B

Ap Chem
explain each of the following observations using principles of atomic stucture and/or bonding. a] potassium has a lower firstionization engergy than lithium. b] the ionic radius of N3 is larger than that of O2. c] a calcium atom is larger than a zinc
 asked by Emily
Still need help?
You can ask a new question or browse existing questions.