7. why were there fewer slaves in the backcountry of the southern colonies than those areas closer to the coast
Colonists in the backcountry were primarily self sufficient
Backcountry colonists were fundamentally opposed to slavery
Colonists in the backcountry were poor and couldn't afford slaves••
Slaves had no way to travel to the backcountry to support the colonists ••
8. Why is the Mayflower compact significant?
It was the first written document forbidding colonists from voting directly on laws
It was the first written document that did not recognize citizens rights
It was the first written expression of citizens rights by the colonists ••
It was the first written government document not created by the colonists
7. A and c
8. C
These are a 100% correct
Yall are probably home schooled i am not anymore but i used to come on this site to help and help others and now i just see what people post : )
7. One of your answers is wrong.
8. Correct
For questions 7 b and c?
7 c is correct.
Yes I know that but would B be the other answer?
No.
Check your text.
7. The correct answer is: Colonists in the backcountry were poor and couldn't afford slaves.
In order to determine why there were fewer slaves in the backcountry of the southern colonies compared to areas closer to the coast, we can analyze the provided options.
Option 1: Colonists in the backcountry were primarily self-sufficient. While self-sufficiency may have played a role in the lives of backcountry colonists, it does not directly explain why there were fewer slaves in those areas.
Option 2: Backcountry colonists were fundamentally opposed to slavery. This option suggests that the colonists in the backcountry opposed slavery, but there is no evidence provided to support this claim.
Option 3: Colonists in the backcountry were poor and couldn't afford slaves. This answer is the most accurate. It implies that the lack of financial resources among backcountry colonists prevented them from purchasing and owning slaves.
Option 4: Slaves had no way to travel to the backcountry to support the colonists. This option is not supported by any evidence and does not explain why there were fewer slaves in the backcountry.
Therefore, option 3, "Colonists in the backcountry were poor and couldn't afford slaves," is the best explanation for why there were fewer slaves in the backcountry of the southern colonies.
8. The correct answer is: It was the first written expression of citizens' rights by the colonists.
To understand the significance of the Mayflower Compact, let's examine the provided options:
Option 1: It was the first written document forbidding colonists from voting directly on laws. This option suggests that the Mayflower Compact restricted colonists from directly participating in the lawmaking process. However, this is not accurate.
Option 2: It was the first written document that did not recognize citizens' rights. This option implies that the Mayflower Compact did not acknowledge the rights of the colonists. However, this is also incorrect.
Option 3: It was the first written expression of citizens' rights by the colonists. This answer is the most accurate. The Mayflower Compact was a document created by the Pilgrims aboard the Mayflower in 1620. It established a social contract among the settlers and expressed their desire to create a self-governing society based on majority rule and a commitment to the common good. Although it did not explicitly outline individual rights, it was significant as an early example of self-government and the colonists taking part in establishing the rules and governance of their community.
Option 4: It was the first written government document not created by the colonists. This option is incorrect because the Mayflower Compact was indeed created by the colonists themselves.
In summary, the Mayflower Compact is significant because it was the first written expression of citizens' rights by the colonists, demonstrating their commitment to self-governance and setting a precedent for future government structures in the American colonies.