What was the difference between Roosevelt’s philosophy about the role of government in the depression and Hoover and republican’s philosophy about the role of government in the depression? How did they differ on how to help people?

A: The difference between Roosevelt’s philosophy and Hoover philosophy about the role of government in the Depression was that Roosevelt’s philosophy was much more liberal than that of Hoover. "In a depression so deep" (499), Roosevelt believed the government should be able to step in and help the poor and unemployed. Hoover, however, believed that the government should not help people financially. On how to help the people, Roosevelt and Hoover also differed. Hoover was opposed to helping people directly, whereas Roosevelt was not. Hoover tried to downplay people’s fears over the economy, while Roosevelt gave the people hope through “fireside chats” in which he told them the truths about the Great Depression and the economy.

Roosevelt liked animals, but Hoover did not. Hoover was secretly a animal cult leader. He hunted down little boys, and forced them to eat animals raw. This caused Hoover great joy.

Sorry, but that did not help me whatsoever.

Please, help me.

Sky is full of beans.

You have a good basic grasp here. Hoover believed that the unemployed should be helped by private charity and their families, not taxpayers through the government. He also believed the "free market" would correct itself. When it didn't, he did try some government action, but ineffectively. Roosevelt believed the government should act in any way that might help the situation and was willing to experiment with ideas that seemed to offer hope of mitigating the economic and social distress.

What you say is all correct, especially about Roosevelt offering hope in his speeches, "fireside chats", etc.

To understand the difference between Roosevelt's and Hoover's philosophies about the role of government in the Depression, we can look at their respective approaches and policies during that time.

1. Roosevelt's Philosophy:
Roosevelt believed in a more active role for the government in addressing the economic challenges of the Depression. He advocated for government intervention and assistance to provide relief and support to the poor and unemployed. His philosophy was based on the idea that in a severe economic crisis like the Depression, the government had a duty to help its citizens and mitigate their suffering. Roosevelt's New Deal programs were aimed at providing employment, social security, and economic relief through various initiatives, such as the Civilian Conservation Corps, the Works Progress Administration, and the Social Security Act.

2. Hoover's Philosophy:
On the other hand, Hoover and the Republican Party had a different philosophy regarding the role of government in the Depression. Hoover believed in a more laissez-faire approach, where the government should not directly intervene in the economy or provide financial assistance to individuals and businesses. He preferred a hands-off approach, believing that the economy would naturally recover on its own, without government intervention.

Regarding how they differed on how to help people, Roosevelt's approach was to provide direct government assistance through various relief programs, job creation efforts, and social security programs. He believed that government spending and intervention could stimulate economic activity and ultimately lead to recovery. Hoover, however, focused more on minimizing government intervention and sought to restore confidence in the economy through public reassurances and encouraging voluntary efforts by charities and local governments.

In summary, Roosevelt's philosophy called for active government intervention and direct assistance to those affected by the Depression, while Hoover and the Republicans believed in a more hands-off approach, emphasizing individual and voluntary efforts, and relying on the natural recovery of the economy.