Under pluralism, a member of two interest groups competing over an issue such as health care or the environment would likely
A. Resign his or her membership from both group
B. Decide to remain neutral on the issue
C. Try to have both groups reach a compromis.
D. Pick one side in the conflict.
Is the answer C?
Yes, I agree.
Ideally, yes.
Yes, the correct answer is C. Try to have both groups reach a compromise.
Pluralism is a political theory that suggests that power is dispersed among various interest groups in society. Each group represents different perspectives and works to pursue their own interests. In this scenario, a member of two interest groups competing over an issue, such as health care or the environment, would likely attempt to have both groups reach a compromise.
To arrive at this answer, it's important to understand the concept of pluralism and how it applies to this situation. Pluralism emphasizes the idea that in a democratic society, multiple interest groups should have the opportunity to participate in the policy-making process. These groups often have conflicting objectives, but the belief is that through negotiation and compromise, a solution that accommodates various interests can be reached.
In this case, the member's dual membership in two competing interest groups suggests a potential conflict of interest. To address this conflict, the member may try to bridge the gap between the groups and facilitate a compromise that considers the concerns and goals of both sides.
Therefore, the individual would likely attempt to have both groups reach a compromise, which is option C.