What is the difference between a scientific theory and a scientific law?

A. A scientific theory describes a pattern of observations, while a scientific law is an educated guess based on observation.

B. A scientific theory is based on a few experiments, while a scientific law is based on many experiments.

C. A scientific theory is an explanation that best fits a pattern of observations, while a scientific law is an accepted statement that describes a consistently observed pattern.***

D.A scientific theory is a law of nature and does not change, while a scientific law is modified when new evidence is found.

I think c is it correct?

Go away, Mr. Flitcher

Thanks

I agree.

Yes, Option C is correct. A scientific theory is an explanation that best fits a pattern of observations, while a scientific law is an accepted statement that describes a consistently observed pattern. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence, experiments, and observations. It is generally supported by a wide range of scientific evidence and has undergone extensive testing and peer review.

On the other hand, a scientific law is a concise and general statement that describes a consistently observed pattern or behavior in nature, usually expressed in mathematical terms. Unlike a theory, a scientific law does not seek to explain why a phenomenon occurs but rather describes the phenomenon itself. Scientific laws are typically derived from repeated observations and experiments and have been found to hold true under a wide range of conditions.

Therefore, while both scientific theories and scientific laws are important in the field of science, they serve different purposes and play distinct roles in understanding and describing the natural world.

You're welcome.

cheaters