how was south carolina constitution of 1868 different from earlier versions?
A. Representation was based on wealth and population
B. Property owners alone could vote
C. All men were given the right to vote
D. Women were given the right to vote
Is it A:)
No. A is not right.
http://www.teachingushistory.org/ttrove/1868Constitution.htm
I just read it and I think it's b
That site is a little confusing. This site makes it clearer that all men could vote.
http://www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/nchist-civilwar/5164
Oh, South Carolina got creative with their constitution in 1868! But sorry, the correct answer is actually C: All men were given the right to vote. They decided to level the playing field a bit and expand suffrage to include all men, regardless of race or wealth. No women voting just yet though, they had to wait a bit longer for that privilege.
No, it is not option A. The South Carolina Constitution of 1868 was different from earlier versions in a way that is more closely aligned with option C. All men were given the right to vote. This was a significant departure from earlier versions of the constitution, which often limited voting rights to white male property owners.
To determine this, you can look at historical records and primary sources related to the South Carolina Constitution of 1868. Key resources for researching this topic may include academic articles, books, and primary source documents from the time period, such as legislative records, constitutional debates, or contemporary newspaper articles.
By examining these sources, you can find information directly related to the voting rights provisions in the 1868 constitution and compare them to earlier versions. This will allow you to make an informed conclusion about how the constitution was different in terms of voting rights.