Which of the following was NOT intended to protect against tyranny?

A. Separation of powers

B. Federalism

C. Checks and balances

D. Single federal executive

is it D

Correct again! :-)

thank you

You're welcome.

Yes, you are correct. D. Single federal executive was NOT intended to protect against tyranny.

To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the concept of tyranny and the measures taken to guard against it. The Founding Fathers of the United States implemented several key principles in the Constitution to prevent the concentration of power and protect against tyranny.

A. Separation of powers: This principle divides the powers of the government into three branches - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The idea behind this separation is to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful by having a system of checks and balances.

B. Federalism: Federalism is a system of government where power is divided between a central authority and individual states. It allows for a balance of power between the federal government and state governments.

C. Checks and balances: This principle ensures that no one branch of government becomes too powerful. Each branch has specific powers to check and balance the actions of the other branches. For example, the president can veto legislation passed by Congress, but Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority.

D. Single federal executive: This option refers to having a single person as the head of the federal government, such as a president. While having a single federal executive is a feature of the American government, it does not directly protect against tyranny. Instead, it is the other principles like separation of powers and checks and balances that are specifically designed to safeguard against tyranny.

Therefore, the correct answer is D. Single federal executive.