What are two traits of an information source that may indicate the information given is scientifically unreliable?

Answer: peer review does not necessarily indicate that the other field expert reviews are in agreement with conclusions of the original writer, and a well researched publication on material that is sponsored by large corporation can be highly biased.

I am trying to find a correct answer and thought this might be it.

How about only one hypothesis has been tested

two traits, from the source you read:

lack of peer review, the author not being a respected source, and having an old publication date. That is three, choose two.

I am wondering (you don't have to answer), are you scanning material looking for the "answer", and nor reading/digesting the material? That is a lousy way to learn...regurgitating what others have said. Try to start to (at least in your mind) outline what you read, and as bullets, the authors main points, not her words.

I have no idea. Please help! :(

ANSWER:

two traits of an information source that may indicate the information given is scientifically unreliable is 1. the evidence used to support a scientific claim and 2. whether or not the source is biased.

To identify if an information source is scientifically unreliable, there are two key traits to look for:

1. Lack of peer review: Peer review is an important process in scientific publishing, where experts in the field critically evaluate and review research before it gets published. If an information source lacks peer review or doesn't mention it, it may indicate that the information has not undergone rigorous scrutiny by qualified experts. However, it's important to note that even if an article has gone through peer review, it doesn't guarantee complete accuracy or agreement among all experts.

2. Bias or conflict of interest: Another trait that can indicate scientific unreliability is bias or a conflict of interest. This can occur when a publication or study is sponsored or funded by a company or organization with a vested interest in specific outcomes. This bias can influence the reported conclusions or interpretation of data and can undermine the scientific validity of the information.

When evaluating the reliability of scientific information, it's recommended to consider multiple sources, especially those from reputable journals or institutions with established expertise in the field. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and helps identify any biases or lack of expert consensus. Critical thinking and analyzing the methodology, evidence, and possible conflicting interests are crucial to ensuring the reliability of scientific information.

Plagarizer. http://www.wikihow.com/Evaluate-the-Credibility-of-a-Source

The answers are there, but you need to stop copying the wrong parts, and trying to baffle your readers with words. Your above answer is ridiculous, reading the question itself.